A Socialized Health Care System Requires Population Control and Impeccable Registries

In a nationalized health care system, you need to understand who is who — otherwise the machine could never be able determine who is entitled. The structure depends on how the system CA is created and designed, but with a nationalized health care system you will be monitored by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in america. The nationalized health care system becomes a vehicle for population control.

If you leave the united states and are no longer a resident in town of the state, even if you are a citizen and might maintain a driving license, you will have to report immediately if you want to avoid the 13% health care tax. I use the number 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized health care.

Let’s say you moved and you do not want to pay the 13% tax for services you do not receive, can receive, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The big entity has no interest to let you go so easy. You will end up having to reveal your private life — partner, houses, travel, money, and job to prove your case that you have the right to leave the public health care system and do not need to pay the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your information could be a part of admin court papers that are open and public documents. As soon as you return to the united states, you will be automatically signed up again and the taxes start to collect.

Public universal health care has no interest in protecting your privacy. They want their tax money and, to fight for your liberties, you will have to prove that you meet the requirements to not be taxable. In that process, your private life is up for display.

The national ID-card and national population registry that includes your medical information is a foundation of the nationalized health care system. You can see where this is going — population control and capability use the law and health care access to map all your private life in public places searchable data bank owned and operated by the government.

By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks where you live, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can receive universal health care from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, more information about yourself than you can remember. The Swedish government has had sharing of information between agencies to a new level. ” very simple — to accumulate health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.

It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can modify the registered information in the data. So if you want to change your name, even the slightest change, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry makes it possible to determine who is who under all circumstances and it is necessary for the national health care system. Otherwise, any person could claim to be entitled.

To implement that in the united states requires a completely new doctrine for population registry and control. In an American context that would require that every existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied under stricter identification rules that would match not only data from Internal revenue service, state, city and county government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but almost any agency that provides services to the general public. The reason why a new population registry would be needed in the united states is the fact that lax rules dating back to the 1940s up until the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made a significant percentage of sensitive information about individuals questionable.

If America instead neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be possible and the floodgates for fraud would open and wild neglect of the system would prevail. This would eventually bring down the machine.

It is financially impossible to manufacture a universal health care system without clearly knowing who is entitled and not. The machine needs to have limits of its entitlement. A social security number would not do as these numbers have been passed out through decades to temporary residents that might not even live in the united states or might today be out of status as illegal immigrants.

The Congress has investigated the cost of many of the “public options”, but still we have no clear picture of the actual realm of the group that has to be entitled and under which conditions. The risk is political. It is very straightforward for political reasons to extend the entitlement. Political figures would have a hard time being firm on illegal immigrants’ entitlement, as that would put the political figures on a smashup course with mainly the Hispanic community as they represent a significant section of the illegal immigrants. So the easy sell is then that everyone that is a legal resident in town peculiar or citizen can join according to one fee plan and then the illegal immigrants can join according even to another fee structure. That considers that they actually pay the fee which is a wild guess as they are likely to be able to get access to service without having to state that they are illegal immigrants.

It would work politically — but again — without an impeccable population registry and control over who is who on a national level, this is unlikely to ensure. The machine would be predestined to fail because of lack of funds. If you design a system to provide the health care needs for a population and then increase that population without any additional funds — then naturally it would lead to a lower level of service, declined quality, and waiting lists for complex procedures. In real terms, American health care goes from being a first world system to a under developed system.

Thousands, if not a million, American residents live as any other American citizen but they are still not in good standing with their immigration even if they’ve been here for ten or fifteen years. A universal health care system will raise issues about who is entitled and who is not.

The alternative is for an American universal health care system to surrender to the fact that there is no order in the population registry and just provide health care for everyone who shows up. If that is done, costs will dramatically increase at some level depending on who will pick up the bill — nys government, the federal government, or the public health care system.

Illegal immigrants that have arrived within the last years and make up a significant population would create an enormous pressure on a universal health care, if implemented, in states like Colorado front range and California. If they are given universal health care, it would be a pure loss for the system as they mostly work for cash. They will never be payees into the universal health care system as it is based on salary taxes, and they can’t file taxes.

The difference is that Sweden has little illegal immigrants in comparison to the United states. The Swedes do not provide health care services for illegal immigrants and the illegal immigrants can be charged and deported if they require public service without good legal standing.

This firm and uniform understanding towards illegal immigration is required to avoid a universal health care system from crumbling down and to maintain a sustainable relation between those who pay into the system and those who benefit from it.

The working middle class that has to be the spinal column to pay into the system would not only face that their existing health care is halved in its service value — but most likely face higher cost of health care as they will be the ones to pick up the bill.

The universal health care system would have maybe 60 million to 60 to 70 million “free riders” if based on salary taxes, and perhaps half if based on fees, that won’t pay anything into the system. We already know that approximately 60 million Americans pay no taxes as adults add to that the estimated 10-15 million illegal immigrants.

There is no way that a universal health care system can be viably implemented unless America creates a population registry that can identify the entitlements for each individual and that have to be designed from scratch to a high degree as we can not rely on driver’s license data as the quality would be too low — too many errors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.